Cosmetic Animal Testing Lawsuit

Colombia has banned the use of animal testing for cosmetics.

Cosmetic dentistry logo. Specifically the lawsuit states as a result of being included on the list as well as many similar lists defendants enjoyed the support of peta and millions of consumers who buy cosmetics only from companies that do not conduct animal testingand hence the commercial success of defendants products during the class period was positively. Whereas younger more progressive cosmetic companies boast not tested on animals and cruelty free like badges of honor on their labels. The bill was introduced to the nations congress in 2018 by house representative juan carlos losada.

According to courthouse news the complaint was filed against avon estee lauder and mary kay and states that the companies advertised and marketed their products as being cruelty free when they in fact were. Five years later it also ended the testing of ingredients following this up with a ban on the import and sale of new cosmetics tested on animals abroad in 2013. The ban prohibits the use of animals for testing cosmetics products and ingredients.

It applies to imported or manufactured products. They may use the animal tests as evidence that they used due diligence in conducting safety testing. 16 saying the chinese government required animal testing before cosmetics.

Two major cosmetics brands that champion their cruelty free ethics are facing a lawsuit claiming they misled the public as they allow animal testing on some products abroad. The european union introduced a ban on the testing of finished cosmetic products shampoo make up toothpaste etc on animals in 2004. Animal testing pros and cons.

Testing for these ingredients may have been conducted on animals at one time but is not done so currently. But are we putting ourselves in danger by circumventing animal testing before it reaches humans. People for the ethical treatment of animals removed the two companies from their list of cruelty free companies feb.

Regardless some companies continue to do animal testing as a kind of legal protection against a lawsuit if a product harms a person. Last month we reported that cosmetics giants avon estee lauder and mary kay had allegedly resumed paying for animal testing without informing consumers about their change in practices. Eurocrats have insisted two chemicals used in many cruelty free cosmetics must be tested on animals with protesters saying it destroys the eu wide ban on animal experiments for cosmetics.

Why how and alternatives.