Cosmetic Company No Animal Testing

Lauder and loreal sell in china as it makes it easier to come to an agreement with them to end animal testing.

Cosmetic dental art. Japanese cosmetic companies that do not conduct animal testing without getting into the controversial topic of animal testings here is a list of japanese cosmetic manufacturers that have eliminated animal testing including outsourcing for their finished products and new ingredients except when required by law. Due to the harm done to the animal subjects this testing is opposed by animal rights activists and others. Benefit may use innocent imagery in its marketing but behind the scenes animals are used in cruel tests for its products.

Other cosmetic companies may rely on combinations of scientific literature non animal testing raw material safety testing or controlled human use testing to substantiate their product safety. Bronners aveda and seventh generation. This week 300 independent companies have joined the 600 members of the personal care products council pcpc to officially endorse the humane cosmetics actthe legislation was introduced by bipartisan politicians including vegan senator cory booker d nj in november 2019 and aims to ban the testing of cosmetics on animals nationwide as well as prohibit the import of cosmetics tested on.

Welcome to the searchable database of companies that do and that dont test their products on animals. Companies may determine that animal. The fdc act does not specifically require the use of animals in testing cosmetics for safety nor does the act subject cosmetics to fda premarket approval.

These are just a few of the thousands of companies in our cruelty free databaseby purchasing products solely from cruelty free makeup companies youll be helping to end cruel tests on animals while sending a powerful message to the companies that still test. Episkin is the leading invitro testing service. Loreal hasnt animal tested since the 1980s and created episkin which is the reason in vitro exists.

There is no standard definition for the label cruelty free but we define the term as products that dont involve the use of animals for testing the safety of cosmetics and ingredients. By that definition these brands dont test on animals so we would classify them as cruelty free. The makeup companies in the graphic below dont support tests on sensitive intelligent animals.

Cosmetic animal testing is banned in colombia the european union united kingdom india israel and norway. Mac does not pay for animal testing and nor does loreal.