Cosmetic Companies With Animal Testing

Unfortunately non animal in vivo testing is way more expensive than traditional animal testing and these cosmetic mega companies just dont care about anything except their profit margins.

Cosmetic box cake. The catrice re touch light reflecting concealer is an excellent cruelty free dupe for the ysl touch eclat and its about 36 cheaper. In a huge victory for animals the european union eu israel and india have banned the sale of any cosmetics or cosmetics ingredients that have been tested on animals. But are we putting ourselves in danger by circumventing animal testing before it reaches humans.

Five years later it also ended the testing of ingredients following this up with a ban on the import and sale of new cosmetics tested on animals abroad in 2013. Animal testing pros and cons. The only way it will change is when the consumer demands higher standards regarding their testing procedures.

Whereas younger more progressive cosmetic companies boast not tested on animals and cruelty free like badges of honor on their labels. Here are some of the top cosmetics brands whose products are still tested on animalsand some brands that dont test on animals that you should support instead. Why how and alternatives.

Big beauty brands still test on animals. These marketing bans mean that companies all around the world will have to abandon animal testing for cosmetics they want to sell in these huge markets. The european union introduced a ban on the testing of finished cosmetic products shampoo make up toothpaste etc on animals in 2004.

Companies are moving fast to be a part of this movement and in the european union india israel and norway bans have now been implemented making it illegal to test cosmetics on animals. While there are many cruelty free brands sold in sephora stores sadly sephoras own brand is not cruelty free. This week 300 independent companies have joined the 600 members of the personal care products council pcpc to officially endorse the humane cosmetics actthe legislation was introduced by bipartisan politicians including vegan senator cory booker d nj in november 2019 and aims to ban the testing of cosmetics on animals nationwide as well as prohibit the import of cosmetics tested on.

Benefit may use innocent imagery in its marketing but behind the scenes animals are used in cruel tests for its products. Other cosmetic companies may rely on combinations of scientific literature non animal testing raw material safety testing or controlled human use testing to substantiate their product safety.